Automated Legionella Compliance

Legionella risk management is a compliance problem and an operational problem. Estates are expected to demonstrate that hot and cold water systems are controlled, that flushing is carried out where required, and that evidence is available when auditors, insurers, or internal governance asks for proof. The failure mode is predictable: manual checks are inconsistent, records are fragmented, and engineers spend time visiting sites purely to prove that a routine task happened.

Squared Technologies automates the evidence layer. We provide continuous temperature and usage visibility and produce a defensible record of what happened, when it happened, and what the measured temperatures were. That reduces operational load, improves consistency across estates, and gives teams real-time awareness when conditions drift into the risk band rather than discovering the issue at the next visit.

The operational objective is simple: reduce manual probing, reduce routine trips, and make compliance reporting a by-product of normal operation. Automated flushing workflows can be logged with mean temperatures and timestamps. Where your process requires a controlled flush run, the system can capture the run duration and the resulting temperatures in a way that is easy to audit and easy to share.

The second objective is escalation. Compliance is not just proving that flushing occurred. It is responding when hot or cold sits in the danger zone after a run, when temperatures drift over time, or when a system behaves abnormally. Those conditions need clear alerts routed to the responsible team with enough context to act. A signal without a workflow is just another chart; we build the workflow so the response is consistent.

Across large estates, the cost of access dominates. Plant rooms, service risers, basements, secure facilities and remote sites all make routine attendance expensive and disruptive. Automation reduces the number of visits required purely for compliance, while improving the quality of the evidence produced. When a visit is required, engineers arrive with context: where the deviation occurred, what trend preceded it, and what action is needed.

Evidence quality matters. A defensible audit trail should be consistent, timestamped, and aligned to the workflow you actually operate. It should be easy to produce reports by site, by asset, and by period. It should also support post-incident review: when did temperatures drift, when were runs executed, and what was the observed outcome. This reduces ambiguity and supports assurance when questions are raised.

Deployments are engineered for real sites. We design for coverage, power, access, and maintenance and commission systems so placement and signal quality are validated upfront. The result is a monitoring and evidence layer that scales across estates without becoming another complex IT programme.

If you want automated legionella compliance evidence that reduces manual effort and improves control, we will design the sensing plan and escalation workflows around your estate and your compliance model.